W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Editorial comment - UCR doc

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 05:26:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jgfGkm+dXAPJhiQS5kMeG_gzPqn2HmSQHH0UAmzE1go2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Antoine,

+1

>>Considering that it calls for "users to rate and review data", I suppose
that the extra R-UsageFeedback is in fact R-QualityOpinions.

Thank you for catching this error!

Eric

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While extracting info from the Use Case and Requirement document, I found
> that the use case OEFS
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-OEFS
> has twice the same requirement R-UsageFeedback.
>
> Considering that it calls for "users to rate and review data", I suppose
> that the extra R-UsageFeedback is in fact R-QualityOpinions.
>
>
> And a small typo: Case 20 has "are in it's GitHub repository"
>
> Best,
>
> Antoine
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 12:27:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 March 2015 12:27:01 UTC