Re: Comment Tracker

Dear Phil,

Bernadette, Newton and I are trying to include the comments in the 
Comment Tracker, but we are having some trouble with the tool.

We think the main problem is that the tool is not linking the BP 
Document with the comments. Furthermore, at first it would appear all 
the sections of the BP document on "Section of the document concerned", 
now it does not appear anymore. Finally, we added 4 comments[1-4] that 
are shown together when we click to "View Comments"[5], but the comment 
you have posted before is not there.

Could you help us with it?

Thank you! Kind regards,
Caroline

[1] LC-2998 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/2998>
[2] LC-3000 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/3000>
[3] LC-2999 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/2999>
[4] LC-3001 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/3001>
[5] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/

On 13/03/15 09:35, Phil Archer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I took an action item last week to look into options for tracking 
> comments. As a follow up, and with help from my colleague Dom, I've 
> configured a comment tracking tool we have, see [1].
>
> For each comment received, someone, usually a document editor, adds 
> the comment to the system, referring to the comment's URL from the 
> mail archive. They should classify the comment as one of
>
> substantive
> editorial
> typo
> question
> general comment
> undefined (try not to use this one)
>
> There may be more than one comment per e-mail. I have loaded an 
> example [2].
>
> The WG can then review each comment and record its resolution (all of 
> which is part of the public archive of course).
>
> HTH
>
> Phil.
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP%20Doc%20FPWD/
>
> For Tracker: This is ACTION-142
>
>