Re: dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy [Best practices document(s)]

Makx,

>> Maybe the Best Practice could be called “Respect privacy laws” and the
by-line something like “Data MUST protect personal information to the
extent prescribed by law”.

Good suggestion, I would really value someone like Christine Runnegar
(Privacy Activity) to weigh in on this.

>>By the way, in BP20, the text in “Why” would fit better under “Intended
outcome” because it outlines the “how” and what is under “Intended outcome”
would fit better under “Possible approach” as it recommends an approach to
ensure compliance with the BP.

Yes good catch I think this was missaligned at some point.

Eric S.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to
> privacy [Best practices document(s)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/137
>
> Raised by: Makx Dekkers
> On product: Best practices document(s)
>
> Maybe the Best Practice could be called “Respect privacy laws” and the
> by-line something like “Data MUST protect personal information to the
> extent prescribed by law”.
>
> By the way, in BP20, the text in “Why” would fit better under “Intended
> outcome” because it outlines the “how” and what is under “Intended outcome”
> would fit better under “Possible approach” as it recommends an approach to
> ensure compliance with the BP.
>
> More details:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0234.html
>
>
>
>