- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:24:33 +0000
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Moving the conversation to the WG's mailing list (please don't use GitHub's issue tracker - it just confuses things). -1 to this change. The original text talked about multilingualism as well as specialisations of vocabularies (something that has been lost). The list of vocabs doesn't really tell people which one to use and when. BP#ProvideMetadata already points to DCAT and VoID. And I think if we're going to cite schema.org - which I'm happy to do - then we should tell people when to use that rather than DCAT (a question to which I'm really not sure of the answer). And so on. Overall, I think we should be more specific, giving the criteria ine should use to make a selection and then point to a possible solution. So, if you want DCAT but want to include versioning then use ADMS (which is a DCAT profile). If your aim is specifically to target your metadata at search engines then use schema.org and so on. I don't think the DCAT-AP is relevant here. Phil. On 22/01/2015 16:25, Carlos Laufer wrote: > +1 > > 2015-01-22 14:17 GMT-02:00 carlosiglesias <notifications@github.com>: > >> ------------------------------ >> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87 >> Commit Summary >> >> - Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation >> >> File Changes >> >> - *M* bp.html <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87/files#diff-0> (9) >> >> Patch Links: >> >> - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.patch >> - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.diff >> >> — >> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub >> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87>. >> > > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 17:24:22 UTC