- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:04:34 -0300
- To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
BP are mainly identified by their titles, for example "Provide Metadat BP", i.e., In the document, we don't make a reference to a BP using its number. In the case an extension, I suppose that the numbering of the current version will be stable and a new numbering may be used, no? 2015-01-19 10:58 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: > But if a BP makes a reference to another one? > > And if we extend the document with another version? > > Laufer > > 2015-01-19 11:55 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: >> >> Hi Laufer, >> >> >> The number is generated automatically :) In this case, I think it >> won't be a problem to use numbers. >> >> thanks! >> Bernadette >> >> 2015-01-19 10:51 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I am reviewing the issue of suppressing the BP4 (because we have an >> > entire >> > session about BP for data vocabularies) and if I agree in suppressing it >> > we >> > will have no renumber all the BPs. >> > >> > Is the sequential numbering an ideal way of identifying the BPs? >> > >> > Best, >> > Laufer >> > >> > -- >> > . . . .. . . >> > . . . .. >> > . .. . >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> Centro de Informática >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. . -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 14:05:34 UTC