- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:55:27 -0300
- To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Laufer, The number is generated automatically :) In this case, I think it won't be a problem to use numbers. thanks! Bernadette 2015-01-19 10:51 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: > Hi all, > > I am reviewing the issue of suppressing the BP4 (because we have an entire > session about BP for data vocabularies) and if I agree in suppressing it we > will have no renumber all the BPs. > > Is the sequential numbering an ideal way of identifying the BPs? > > Best, > Laufer > > -- > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. . -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 13:56:21 UTC