- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:17:47 -0300
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Antoine, I agree with you! I think that Data Vocabularies BP should be enough to cover the R-MetadataDocum requirement. I also agree that ' code lists' deserve a better explanation. Let's work on this! Thanks! Bernadette 2015-01-14 21:10 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > Hi Bernadette, > > I'd say that if a list of value becomes sufficiently important to deserve > documentation, it is certainly worth considering it as a vocabulary. > > This would solve your issue. Or at least reduce it to an editorial issue > rather than adding a BP: the section on vocabulary should cover 'lists' well > enough. > > I have tried to add a reference to 'code list' there. It's probably not > enough. That's part of the actions I've noted for myself at [1]. > Please make suggestions! > > Best, > > Antoine > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Making_controlled_vocabularies_accessible_as_URI_sets > > > On 1/14/15 5:13 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue > Tracker wrote: >> >> dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide >> metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices >> document(s)] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/120 >> >> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio >> On product: Best practices document(s) >> >> I think we should discuss the intersection among these BP. >> >> 1. For me it is not clear the difference between Document Metadata and >> Provide Metadata for humans as mentioned in the BP Provide metadata in >> different formats. >> >> 2. The BP Document Metadata mentions vocabularies and controlled lists. >> Since there is a specific BP to Document Vocabularies, then maybe we should >> have a specific BP to Document Controlled Lists. >> >> >> >> >> > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 19:18:36 UTC