- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:02:05 +0000
- To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- CC: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
I'd be grateful if you did it for 2 reasons: 1. I'm not in the ideal place to do it this week; 2. I like collaborative text rather than one person's text. So please go ahead :-) Thanks Phil. On 14/01/2015 15:45, Laufer wrote: >> I will change the text - unless you can get to it before me > Tell me what you prefer... > > Laufer > > 2015-01-14 13:18 GMT-02:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: > >> Oh crap ... that's what comes of writing in a hurry. You are quite correct >> Laufer, sorry. >> >> In my very unconvincing defence, Void does include info about vocabs used >> and exampke SPARQL queries but that's no excuse. I will change the text - >> unless you can get to it before me. I've just landed in Greece for a 2 day >> workshop. >> >> Phil >> >> >>> Hi, Phil, >>> >>> In the text of BP1, VoID is listed as suited for the description of the >>> structure of metadata but I think VoID is more similar to DCAT, but for >>> Linked Data. It describes the dataset as a whole. >>> >>> Am I wrong? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Laufer >>> >>> 2015-01-13 11:00 GMT-02:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: >>> >>>> Bernadette, Newton, >>>> >>>> I've added some more BPs to the metadata section today. There's one more >>>> I >>>> really want to write ASAP which will be about providing structural >>>> metadata >>>> (what Mark Harrison called intrinsic metadata). That will include links >>>> to >>>> things like VoID for RDF datasets, the CSV work for those files etc. >>>> >>>> IMO the doc is looking better but still needs work before Friday. >>>> >>>> Personally, I don't think we should include incomplete BP templates in >>>> the >>>> FPWD. I'd rather see a list of the BPs to be inserted at that pint in >>>> the >>>> doc, so, for example in data formats just a simple list like: >>>> >>>> Provide machine-readable data >>>> Provide data in standardized formats >>>> Provide data in open formats >>>> Provide data in multiple formats >>>> Provide locale parameters >>>> >>>> (that list prompts all sorts of questions by the way - why aren't we >>>> just >>>> using the 5 star model? Shouldn't locale parameters be in the metadata >>>> section? etc.) >>>> >>>> I think that's a more honest reflection of the current situation and >>>> allows people to see which BPs have been drafted and therefore in need >>>> of >>>> review (or ridicule!). >>>> >>>> @Christophe, might you have time to add normative statements to the BPs >>>> you wrote? i.e. add in the RFC 2119 keywords in the intended outcome >>>> sections? >>>> >>>> And, wrt. Issue-115, IMHO the 'What' section can be merged with the Why >>>> - >>>> I think in all cases, unless you/others think differently?? >>>> >>>> Phil. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> Phil Archer >>>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>>> >>>> http://philarcher.org >>>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>>> @philarcher1 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> . . . .. . . >>> . . . .. >>> . .. . >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos. >> > > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 17:02:21 UTC