- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:37:03 +0000
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Dear all, I have just made another couple of additions to the BP doc which are currently BPs 3 & 4. These, I hope, answer Issue-106 so I have closed that one. If, as we plan, this is to become a Recommendation then we will need to gather proof that multiple people have implemented each of the best practices - which is a tough task but that's what we're committed to. In order to be able to do that we need to be very clear on what is normative and what is informative. This is why in the BPs I've written I have included an RFC 2119 keyword (MUST, SHOULD or MAY) in the *Intended Outcome* section. Can other please do this? You can make the keywords explicit thus: <em class="rfc2119">must</em> (the stylesheet will capitalise and colour the word) HTH Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 12:37:05 UTC