public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from December 2015 by subject

"HEADs" up on missing references ;-)

3rd draft DWBP document - Feedback welcome before voting

[Moderator Action] Example 14: wrong media type

[off topic] APIs and government transparency

[Time sensitive] property names

[Time sensitive] property names (was: Pre-publication steps)

[Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps

Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv

Agenda for Friday's meeting

Agenda for the next call (04/12/2015) - the last before the voting call (11/12/15)!

Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile

And for DUV (was Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv)

Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done)

Best Practice 26.docx

Best Practices about Rest APIs

BP15- A proposal for Example 15

Challenges SVG updated

Data usage vocabulary continues to advance...

DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP

DUV Comments

DUV Comments (2)

DUV review

DWBP comments

dwbp-ACTION-220: Reach out with giancarlo about the http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/202

dwbp-ACTION-221: Create rdf vocab for dqv

dwbp-ACTION-222: Will create an rdf vocab (dqv) and put on github

dwbp-ACTION-223: Contact michel dumontier about issue-221

dwbp-ACTION-224: Send a list of things to be added to/addressed in the duv document

dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-222: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-223: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-224: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-225: Levels of granularity for dimensions and categories [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-227: The document has three different indexes for the BP: by challenges, by benefits and the summary. Should we keep the three of them? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Contextsection? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-229: Review requirements x BP [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-231 (hasMetric): metric, hasMetric, something else [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-232 (MyCity CSV files): Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example [Best practices document(s)]

Feedback about BP Benefits - DWBP document

Fwd: Best Practice 26.docx

Issue raised (was Re: [Time sensitive] property names)

issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards

ISSUE-221: What is the importance of the alignment between hcls-dataset and dqv?

Minor tweaks to DUV doc

Mysterious changing property headers

Pre-publication steps

Publication Request for 2 Ordinary WDs

Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations

Removed domain and range from 3rd party vocabularies

Some minor issue on DUV

Some more examples done

Voting documents call - next Friday

Last message date: Tuesday, 22 December 2015 09:06:40 UTC