W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance...

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:28:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jjFjPWJXCU0P9h9Vt7HtgqDiGDAdpKJHG8sCfiiDN+f4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>, Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
Phil,

My apologies for my very nasty text editor causing you extra work.  Berna
pointed me to use Blue Griffon, I'll use this.  I hope that the fact I'm
working on a MacBook doesn't complicate text formatting (Mac vs PC).

Thanks again for all your help!

Eric S

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Thanks very much for the big improvements here, Eric. It's looking a lot
> more coherent. Reusing other people's vocabs as much as possible is always
> a good thing.
>
> I've been through the doc today and done some team contact stuff to it,
> mostly removing all the inline styles that your W|word processor loves to
> put in. But also putting in some cross-links in the doc. I've also made the
> diagram 100% of the width of the page. I can't for the life of me see why
> it doesn't scale if you reduce the window size. I used the same element
> name as we use on DWBP and that scales :-(
>
> Hopefully Peter W will be able to see it in his corporate browser.
>
> I need to focus elsewhere now but I'll return to the doc before Friday's
> call.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil.
>
>
> On 16/12/2015 13:34, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
>> The data usage vocabulary editors are still working on a new revision of
>> the document http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-du.html.  In anticipation
>> of a
>> possible vote this week I wanted those who have interest or commented last
>> week to see where our document was headed.
>>
>> All - Major changes were made reusing existing classes and properties from
>> other vocabularies.  Domains and ranges were added to compliment our
>> model.
>>
>> This revision includes digging deeper into the SPAR ontologies
>> http://www.sparontologies.net/.  At this point I really feel we need to
>> show our work to the citations communities, perhaps they will direct us to
>> reuse other terms that we are currently using.
>>
>> Laufer and Phil - We are still working on the overview, there are a few
>> properties that need to be added to the specification, and the vocabulary
>> needs updating.  That being said, we added significant detail to the model
>> picture adding all the properties as requested.
>>
>> Joao Paulo - We have hopefully addressed most of your concerns about
>> reuse.  We reworked the citation model, and included the a class fabio
>> ontology from SPAR based on examples
>> http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/fabio .  We considered
>> DataCitationAct and looking at CITO CitationAct we felt it satisfied the
>> DUV needs without extending.  We did find notes about tying oa:Annotation
>> and oa:Motivation to help explain the motivation of a citation act.
>>  Based
>> on Phil's recommendations we used the Organization ontology as a example
>> for refining how we want to describe Agents and Usage.
>>
>> Other than the outstanding work I mentioned in this note, as you examine
>> the current document if you are aware of any showstoppers please let us
>> know by Thursday 9pm Honolulu Hawaii time.
>>
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=DUV+Comments&iso=20151217T21&p1=103
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric, Berna, Sumit
>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 19:28:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 16 December 2015 19:28:33 UTC