W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: DUV Comments

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:40:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jjUFGbOWcJ7GSoHMZDngdkYk4cmjLg-Hq2zUPkQTCYnGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
Cc: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>, DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Laufer,

Many thanks for your feedback.  I responded to Phil earlier, because he had
the same concern.  For documents such as these I've always thought of the
diagrams as a general orientation to the vocabulary, not all properties and
classes will be shown in the diagram.  I was thinking of this as being more
conceptual than exact.

 So I guess I'm saying:
1) Specification needs to be complete and include all the detail including
all the properties in the model picture and additional needed for the
vocabulary.
2) TTL needs to match specification.
3) Model picture is more of a visual reference and can be missing some
properties and classes.

I guess another option is breaking the picture an overview and then
detailed view of citation, usage, and feedback.

What do you think?

Eric S


On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hi, Eric, Bernadette and Sumit,
>
> First of all, congratulations for the document!
>
> 1. Here are the list of things that I saw in the diagram and not in the
> specification:
>
> cito:hasCitingEntity
> duv:hasCitationCreator
> oa:hasTarget
> duv:hasUserFeedback
> duv:hasRating
> duv:hasUsageType
> duv:hasUsage
> duv:perfomedBy
> duv:performs
> duv:hasUsageTool
> duv:hasRole
>
>  2. Here are the list of the things that I saw in the specification and
> not in the diagram (not sure if all of them really should appear in the
> diagram):
>
> duv:hasProducer
> duv:hasDistributor
> duv:edition
> duv:hasAccessInformation
> duv:developedBy
>
>
>
> 3. I guess that some names that were changed were not updated in the
> document text:
>
> duv:Feedback --> duv:UserFeedback
> duv:author --> duv:hasAuthor
>
> 4. I think (only my opinion) that a reader could be confused reading the
> examples before the vocabulary overview. Maybe the order of the two
> sections could be changed.
>
> 5. I miss an "informal text serialization" explaining the diagram.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Cheers, Laufer
>
> --
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 11 December 2015 15:40:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 11 December 2015 15:40:42 UTC