Re: Agenda for tomorrow - Data quality vocab

Hi all,

Sending my regrets. Sorry for that. Good meeting.

Abraços,
Laufer



2015-08-27 13:25 GMT-03:00 Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>:

> Hi all
>
> This week's agenda is now up.  Speak tomorrow!
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Hadley
>
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150828
>
>
> == Main agenda ==
>
> * Data Quality Vocabulary
> ** http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/
> ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181 - Should we have only the
> existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata?
> ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/182 - The label of
> daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model -
> ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197 - Issue tracking and
> Github
> *** PROPOSAL: to remove the link to Github
> ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/180 - Are we actually
> allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ?
> *** PROPOSAL: to re-define in the DQV namespace all the classes and
> properties we need to express quality metadata, and map the new classes and
> properties to the ones of DAQ
>
>
>


-- 
.  .  .  .. .  .
.        .   . ..
.     ..       .