- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:24:16 -0700
- To: yaso@nic.br
- Cc: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Re the thought that maybe “data encoded in file formats is out of the scope" [of this working group], I’m not sure what you mean to refer to here. All data on the web is encoded in some type of file format, and if that’s out of scope we can all go home. Did you mean data that has no structure other than that needed to put it into a file format, like PDF and JPG? I would agree with that. It’s just really hard to define accurately, since some file formats impose a useful structure. -Annette -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 510-495-2935 On Apr 23, 2015, at 8:33 AM, yaso@nic.br wrote: > Hi Eric! > > I'm glad you asked. I made a very rough draft and uploaded to my fork on github because the doc is still with no styling and proper IDs. I sent it to Phil and the editors to get some feedback, but had no answer till now. > > Basically, I picked the idea of that conversation at the f2f and threshed the details of the Data on the Web Life cycle proposed by Bernadette. The draft is at [1] and you can see it rendered at [2]. > > What I am proposing is that we use actions that transforms data in to something else, like a dataset or metadata, as turning points to divide whether someone is a publisher or a consumer. Furthermore, as a data creator can be also someone that collects data from others using software, like facebook or yandex, I propose that we focus on 3 "representations" of data: data (as raw data), dataset (as encoded file or structured dataset) or metadata (whatever is the format). > > Given this way of thinking the cycle of data on the web, data archiving techniques and data preparation or data planning are out of the scope of this WG, thought 303 pages and 404 are in. Data encoded in file formats is out of the scope also, but only if people involved with data mining and enriching wants. > > The idea still have to be polished, but I think it is a good way out for our abstractsss discussions to focus on actions performed to delineate concrete lines of definitions. > > I'm keen for the feedback of the WG. > > [1] https://github.com/yaso/dwbp > [2] http://yaso.is/dwbp/glossary.html > > > Cheers > Yaso > > > > > Quoting "Eric Stephan" <ericphb@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Ig, >> >> There are quite a bit of definitions floating around, I was wondering if >> you needed help on this task. Please let me know. >> >> Eric S >> >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/174 >> > > > >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 14:25:22 UTC