Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13

Hi,

These two sounds like more along the lines of SLA and what industry use
would expect, so "industry reuse" looks like a good place. But this
information will be given as metadata so it could also be a good idea to
put them there as metadata one could expect to find - especially the
industry but everyone else too.

Christophe

On 25 September 2014 00:05, Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm opening this issue back to the group. 'Use Case #15 - Documented
> Support and Release of Data' sets out two requirements that currently
> aren't included in our requirement list. I therefore propose the addition
> of these two requirements:
>
>
>
> ·         IncludeSupportMechanism
>
> ·         IncludeReleaseSchedule
>
>
>
> Feedback on should these requirements be included and in what requirements
> section they should be included (metadata, data access, industry reuse?) is
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Deirdre
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> Sent: 19 September 2014 13:22
> To: Lee, Deirdre
> Cc: Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Subject: Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18/09/2014 15:53, Lee, Deirdre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > In one of the recent Friday telcos and/or on the email list we have
> discussed the following issue that you raised about the DWBP Use Case &
> Requirement (UCR):
>
> >
>
> > ISSUE-13: Improve Use case "Documented Support and Release of Data"
>
> > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/13
>
> >
>
> > Can you confirm that this issue has been addressed in the updated
>
> > version of the UCR doc, available here:
>
> > http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-page
>
> > s/usecasesv1.html
>
> >
>
> > If you agree, I will close the issue.
>
>
>
> Yes and no. I think it's really about the difference between potential
> requirement and requirement. There is a requirement to include info about
> the update cycle in the metadata, which has now been lost. I think I've
> caused confusion and extra work where I didn't mean to.
>
>
>
> There's a bit of blurred line between a challenge and a requirement.
>
> Both of the challenges listed can be rephrased as requirements.
>
>
>
> How about the challenges as:
>
> Provide information about the management cycle of the data and who is
> responsible for it.
>
>
>
> Requirements:
>
> AccessUptodate
>
> SLAAvailable
>
>
>
> Plus...
>
>
>
> updateCycle (the data update cycle should be included in the metadata)
>
>
>
> contactPoint (contact information for the data provider should be included
> in the metadata)
>
>
>
> WDYT?
>
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> > Deirdre
>
> > Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group Insight Center for
>
> > Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> > Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
>
> > Linkedin:
>
> > ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/>
>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> Phil Archer
>
> W3C Data Activity Lead
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
>
>
> http://philarcher.org
>
> +44 (0)7887 767755
>
> @philarcher1
>



-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>