W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:36:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAFP3_qHcnMFOJudz8ewkMUz_TA3Nq-AU6z99e=G-Ekr3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
CC: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
+0.5 ;)

Not sure about the granularity point. I agree with Makx this exists and
should be handled but I'm not sure we have to explicitly mention it. This
may confuse readers. I'll think more about it...

Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 28 nov. 2014 14:30 schreef "Ghislain Atemezing" <
auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:

> On 28/11/2014 14:23, Christophe Guéret wrote:
> > That looks fine to me. I would just widen the description to allow for
> > versioning any resource, not only datasets.
>
> What about this one ? (re-using Makx sample)
>
> *R-VersionURIDesign*: “Publishers should consider having a canonical way
> to design URIs for different versions of the resources at differnt
> granularity, such as collection of items or individual terms. ”
>
> Cheers,$
> Ghislain
> --
> Ghislain Atemezing
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> Campus SophiaTech
> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
> Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
> Twitter:@gatemezing
>
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 13:37:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC