W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:30:57 +0100
Message-ID: <54787911.3070602@eurecom.fr>
To: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
CC: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
On 28/11/2014 14:23, Christophe Guéret wrote:
> That looks fine to me. I would just widen the description to allow for
> versioning any resource, not only datasets.

What about this one ? (re-using Makx sample)

*R-VersionURIDesign*: “Publishers should consider having a canonical way 
to design URIs for different versions of the resources at differnt 
granularity, such as collection of items or individual terms. ”

Cheers,$
Ghislain
-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
Twitter:@gatemezing
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 13:31:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC