W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:23:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAHsqiGFUmafyo38H4Wnqxjev9+WUMF=vOYSS_5b6pDn4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
CC: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hoi,

That looks fine to me. I would just widen the description to allow for
versioning any resource, not only datasets.

Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 28 nov. 2014 14:13 schreef "Ghislain Atemezing" <
auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:

>
> Hi Bernadette, all
>
> However, it is not clear for me if the new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*:
> “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of
> the dataset.”  concerns versions of both (datasets and vocabularies).
>
>
> I was considering here versioning of datasets in general, having in mind
> that a vocabulary is a “kind-of” dataset. Although with a different
> purpose, an ontology can generate dataset as well.
>
> Hope this clarifies a bit what I was trying to propose.
>
> Cheers,
> Ghislain
>
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 13:24:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC