W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: DWBP document - general information

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:22:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAHKXtU295NoVL-4SLO3gd-Dbb4BdP=jK_hXWwmQst7X8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
CC: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Bernadette,

Thanks for putting back all that in one mail, very useful :-)

I would like to port the content from the previous preservation page into
the new one and I'm not sure how to best relate that with the template (by
the way, [6] is broken but I guess it is the same as
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bptemplate.html ). Shall we just use the same
wording as on the template ? or is there maybe some markup to use to
facilitate the conversion later ?

Cheers,
Christophe



On 19 November 2014 15:06, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> During the F2F at Santa Clara, we had a lot of discussions about the scope
> [1] and the organization of the best practices document, and some important
> decisions were made [2], including:
>
> - All of our best practices will be in one document, because it is easier
> for readers/implementers to understand and easier for editors/contributors
> to manage.
>
> - Each best practice will be defined according to a specific structure.
> During TPAC, Phil proposed a template structure [6].
>
> - Our scoping criteria [1], i.e., requirements and best practices should
> be defined considering the following criteria :
>         - Is it unique to publishing data on the Web?
>         - Does it encourage reuse or publication of data on the Web?
>         - Is it testable? In what way?
>
> It is really important to keep these information in mind during best
> practices definition.
>
> We also had an agreement abou the organization of the best practices
> document [3] and some contributors were defined [4].
>
> Finally, in order to facilitate the edition of the document, new wiki
> pages were created for each one of the proposed sections [4]. In general,
> each section should have a general description about the theme (ex: Data
> vocabularies, Data formats...), followed by one or more best practices. It
> is also important to give examples to illustrate the best practices.
> Documents that were previously created should be adapted in order to be
> included in the BP document.
>
> Contributors are free to use the new wiki pages or to directly edit the
> draft available on github [5]. We kindly ask you to send an email to the
> group or to the editors when a new update is made.
>
> kind regards,
> Bernadette, Caroline and Newton
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html
> [3]
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Table_of_Contents_of_Data_on_the_Web_Best_Practices
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices
> [5] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
> [6] http://philarcher.org/dwbp/bptemplate.html
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:23:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC