W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Canceling Vocabulary calls?

From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:55:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKckEu4EzZ0Lck814H73VZb0tQAMX3-dvBn2PALfzPRF6Q6y9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernadette Farias Loscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Agree to suspend
Op 11 nov. 2014 15:50 schreef "Bernadette Farias Lóscio" <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>:

> I also agree with Eric!
>
> kind regards,
> Bernadette
>
> 2014-11-10 13:39 GMT-02:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>
>> I agree with Eric's suggestion.
>> It seems that we need more to discuss on agree on things, rather than
>> exhausting ourselves maintaining processes that are not strictly needed now!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> On 11/8/14 9:10 PM, Eric wrote:
>>
>>> Based on our F2F discussions it seems that many efforts such as the
>>> vocabularies hinge on the scoping that occurs in the Best practices
>>> document.
>>>
>>> Would it make since to cancel vocabulary editor calls at least until
>>> 2015?
>>>
>>> If it is important to keep the calls going, we need guidance on how best
>>> to proceed.  One option might be devoting efforts to identifying
>>> requirements in the 2nd round of use cases.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Eric S
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC