W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: New Ed Draft of UCR

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:57:10 -0200
Message-ID: <CANx1Pzy3fUFxH0X5H3zU36pECdFehZtx5ABYPTsscNMR=mTn1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Hi Phil,

Thank you very much for the updating!

As a next step, for each new requirement, I think we should discuss:

- the requirement is in our scope ?
- the requirement can be associated to one of the existing challenges or a
new challenge should be created ?

cheers,
Bernadette



2014-11-11 6:32 GMT-02:00 Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>:

> That's great Phil thanks! I'm travelling at the moment,but will be back on
> Thursday. I will have a look over doc and see where I can help in terms of
> resolved issues from TPAC and new use-cases.
>
> Cheers,
> Deirdre
>
> Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Phil Archer [phila@w3.org]
> Sent: 10 November 2014 20:49
> To: Public DWBP WG; Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J); Annette Greiner; Eric
> Stephan
> Subject: New Ed Draft of UCR
>
> Dear all,
>
> As the flurry of new issues in your inbox shows, I've been working on
> the UCR doc today, see
>
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html.
>
> Changes made:
>
> - The Reqs that we resolved to remove have been removed.
>
> - The new use cases in the wiki have been added (except those proposed
> by Fraunhofer, see ISSUE-93 and ISSUE-94).
>
> - I have added some new requirements in based on my assessment of the
> new new cases. For each new proposed requirement I opened an issue. see
> ISSUE-83, ISSUE-85, ISSUE-86, ISSUE-87, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-89, ISSUE-91.
>
> Lewis, Annette, Eric - please take a look at what I've done to your use
> cases. In Annette's case I think we need to talk through what the
> possible reqs will be - I suspect there will be a lot of commonality
> with the RDESC one and we'll have some new reqs out of it.
>
> The R-Location requirement is one I added based on my own new use case
> (and I think it's useful in Lewis's too). But see Issue-96 as this use
> case is a little different - I'd like to essentially refer to the report
> of a workshop as the use case.
>
> There are other minor changes but those are the main ones.
>
> Not done yet - there's a good deal of housekeeping to do yet but I hope
> this counts as progress.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 12:57:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC