RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call

Dear All,

Regrets for today, but I had to make an appointment today.

If the WG things I can help, I am interested in the   deliverables Data
Usage vocab, data quality vocab and BP 5.

All the best,
Ig
On May 9, 2014 8:50 AM, "Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've to give my regrets too, I'm at the OGP Regional Meeting in Dublin
> with Steve and Martin.
>
> Bernadette and I have combined the use-cases and requirements into one doc
> and refined some of the requirements. Final step is to refer to the
> use-cases from each requirement. The latest version of the use-case doc is
> available on github.
>
> Could we add a discussion on the use-case talk to next week's agenda?
>
> Cheers,
> Deirdre
>
> Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Eric [ericphb@gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2014 08:35
> To: Ivan Herman
> Cc: Antoine Isaac; public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call
>
> Regrets for me as well.  I am returning late from an escience data
> reproducibility workshop.  I am interested in #2 either as a coeditor or
> contributor what ever makes the most sense.
>
> Eric Stephan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 8, 2014, at 11:34 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have another one-time call partially overlapping with this call; I
> will probably not be able to join this one. Apologies
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >> On 09 May 2014, at 02:36 , Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Regrets from me as well, I'm on holidays...
> >>
> >> I'd be willing to help on #1, if I'm not the only editor.
> >>
> >> #8 sounds like what is needed is only a summary of parts of SKOS
> documents. I can help, but perhaps it's interesting to let someone less
> expert play with it, and my reviewing a bit later...
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >>> On 5/8/14 7:37 PM, Hadley Beeman wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've just posted our agenda for tomorrow's call.  [1]
> >>>
> >>> In addition to discussing progress on our action items [2], we will
> also be agreeing who will lead each of our documents.  This is your chance
> to put your expertise into the working group's documents and to take a
> leadership role in getting our words out to where they can make a
> difference.
> >>>
> >>> We will be looking for editors/contributors for each of these: [3]
> >>>
> >>> 1. Data quality vocabulary (editor who will set the document
> structure, write at least some of the content, coordinate other
> contributors, respond to public comments, and format the documents for
> publication)
> >>> 2. Data usage vocabulary (editor who will set the document structure,
> write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors, respond
> to public comments, and format the documents for publication.)
> >>> 3. Best practices document.  (Series editors, who will be "big
> picture" thinkers. They will identify areas we haven't covered but should,
> make sure the various sections can flow together, and supervise
> publication.)
> >>> 4.  BP:  URI design and management for persistence:
> (editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate
> other contributors, respond to public comments)
> >>> 5.  BP:  Use of core vocabularies to improve interoperability:
> (editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate
> other contributors, respond to public comments)
> >>> 6.  BP:  Guidance on the provision of metadata: (editor/contributors
> to write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors,
> respond to public comments)
> >>> 7.  BP:  Publishing and accessing versions of datasets:
> (editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate
> other contributors, respond to public comments)
> >>> 8.  BP:  Making controlled vocabularies accessible as URI sets:
> (editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate
> other contributors, respond to public comments)
> >>> 9.  BP:  Technical factors for consideration when choosing data sets
> for publication: (editor/contributors to write at least some of the
> content, coordinate other contributors, respond to public comments)
> >>> 10.  BP:  Technical factors affecting potential use of open data for
> innovation, efficiency and commercial exploitation: (editor/contributors to
> write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors, respond
> to public comments)
> >>> 11.  BP:  Data preservation: (editor/contributors to write at least
> some of the content, coordinate other contributors, respond to public
> comments)
> >>> Roles can be divided between multiple, if we like. It's up to us.
> >>>
> >>> Please have a think about what interests you and be ready to discuss
> which part(s) you would like to work on.
> >>>
> >>> Looking forward to speaking to you tomorrow!
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>  Hadley
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140509
> >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open
> >>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Deliverables
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C
> > Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> > WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>