Re: DBPedia use-case

Hi Deirdre,

I think the DBPedia use-case should focus on technical challenges of the
both data publishers and data users. The DCAT extension fits in the
technical challenges of the dbpedia data publishers.

Other vocab that we need to work according to the charter (Data Usage
Description Vocab) fits in the technical challenges of the dbpedia data
users. However, it is sitll not clear to me, for example, is this new vocab
an extension of DCMI [1]?

Perhaps, we are going to have a better clarification after Phil's meeting
in Athens.

[1] http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/

Best,
Ig

2014-03-18 19:21 GMT-03:00 Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>:

>  Hi all,
>
> With my use-case editor hat on, I'm not sure how to create a 'use-case'
> from the dbpedia story. DBpedia is a great example of publishing Linked
> Data on the Web, so what angle are we focusing on?
>
>    - Technical challenges of the dbpedia data publishers
>     - (are there any? perhaps Phil's question of how to describe the
>       veracity and reliability of crowd-sourced data in the DCAT extension fits
>       here?)
>    - Technical challenges of the dbpedia data users (again, not sure what
>    these are?)
>    - Potential improvements/refinements (like encouraging them to adopt
>    more W3C vocabs - but would this have much impact on dbpedia over the
>    ontology they currently use?)
>    - Looking at how dbpedia and extracting best practices from their
>    approach?
>
> If anyone has any thought, feel free to edit the use-case in the wiki; I
> only got as far as adding the title!
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Deirdre
>
>    Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
>
> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
>
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 15:07:21 UTC