W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Agenda for 07-03-2014

From: Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:04:33 -0500
To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Cc: "Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Yaso <yaso@nic.br>
Message-ID: <OFEB7B8380.8A80684A-ON85257C93.006861FA-85257C93.0068C97E@us.ibm.com>
yes.  we should include it because it is relevant, but understand that 
most Open Data devs are just thrilled that they can use linked data with 
json and shudder when asked to climb the heights of RDF...


Best Regards,

Steve

Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"



From:
Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
To:
Steven Adler/Somers/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:
"Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" 
<public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Yaso <yaso@nic.br>
Date:
03/06/2014 01:55 PM
Subject:
Re: Agenda for 07-03-2014



Hi all,

Given the new release of RDF 1.1 with its inclusion of the dataset concept 
(collection of named graphs), should we add a use case that describes 
this?    I would think this would be fairly important topic in the future 
whether you are discussing best practices for 5 star linked data, declared 
datasets existing in large triple stores or managing rdf documents.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#section-dataset 

What do you think?

Eric


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Great idea Deirdre.  I have already learned so much from all of you during 
our too brief joint discussion of the Palo Alto use case and would love to 
hear others describe and discuss the others we have collected (including 
the Stories below the use cases) and those yet to come. 


Best Regards,

Steve

Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again" 


From: 
"Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org> 
To: 
Yaso <yaso@nic.br>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org> 
Date: 
03/06/2014 09:40 AM 
Subject: 
RE: Agenda for 07-03-2014





Hi Yaso, 

Can I suggest that we add a slot to discuss about the Use Case document 
and the new structure?

I would like to encourage all members of the WG to add a Use Case here: 
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use_Cases So far there are only three :(

With our extensive and varied experience, I'm sure we are all coming to 
the WG with specific use-cases, which we would like to improve through the 
work of the group. Now is your chance to add them!

Talk to you tomorrow.
Deirdre

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deirdre Lee
Research Associate
eGovernment Domain (DEG)
Insight-NUIG
IDA BusinessPark, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland

deirdre.lee@deri.org
skype: deirdrelee
twitter: @deirdrelee
linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaso [mailto:yaso@nic.br] 
Sent: 06 March 2014 01:20
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: Agenda for 07-03-2014

Hi BP WG!

This is the proposed agenda for the next meeting.
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140307

If anyone have another topic, please feel free to suggest here, at the 
list, or just add at the wiki.



Kind regards,
Yaso




--
Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br W3C Brazil Office @yaso - 
yaso.eu

55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
skype: yasocordova
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:05:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:12 UTC