W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > June 2014

Re: BP Guidelines

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:47:23 +0200
Cc: Joăo Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0D0D9393-307B-4F0D-8643-6CA06996C0E1@eurecom.fr>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Hi Bernadette,
[sorry to jump in this thread ] But...

> Analysing the use cases and the UC Requirements for Licenses (Section 4.1.5 from [1]), we identify that licenses should also be available in a machine readable format and that standard vocabularies should be used to describe licenses. In this case, I guess that licenses are also something that should be properly published. 

what do you mean by “standard vocabularies”? Do you mean “popular ones" [1,2,3], or “meta level ones” [4] ?
Why couldn’t not extend the notion to “vocabularies”. If we really want to talk about “standard vocabulary”, we might need to agree on the terminology to avoid confusion.

Thanks again for your nice work. More comments will come after ..;)

Cheers,
Ghislain

[1]- http://prefix.cc/popular
[2] -http://stats.lod2.eu/vocabularies
[3]- http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/stats/
[4] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_Metadata.html
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 14:48:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:14 UTC