W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Minutes from today's vocabularies call - issue handling

From: Eric <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:10:50 -0700
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2AA865EA-7B12-47EB-ADCE-3D95D8336848@gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Hi Antoine,

If I remember correctly the discussion included thinking about tracking originators who raised issues  from outside the working group.  In this case it is my impression that we would need to track this manually.

Eric

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> 
>> with another reference to the person responsible for resolving the
> issue
> 
> In principle the issue tracker records who technically creates the issue in the first place. This should be enough.
> In case the issue gets assigned to someone else, this gets naturally recorded through the action tracking system, no?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
>> On 6/13/14 2:07 AM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>> Hi Antoine,
>> 
>> Through a vote we decided to have issue tracking take place in the
>> general DWBP issue tracker.  With regards to how to report issues, it
>> seemed as though the general consensus was to provide a reference to
>> the person reporting the issue (including an email address)  along
>> with another reference to the person responsible for resolving the
>> issue.  I like your idea about citing the original email in the issue.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Eric
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the minutes!
>>> And thanks Hadley for chairing and Eric for volunteering for the next one...
>>> 
>>> I have one question on the minutes though: what has been decided for the
>>> issue tracking?
>>> I'm not sure I understand the problem about keeping track of the provenance
>>> of comments, once we decide that the issues are connected to
>>> 
>>> Personally I would use the good old practices from the first group I've been
>>> into:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess
>>> 
>>> when we received comments, we indeed noted who sent them, but the most
>>> adequate tracking was made by just making sure we would cite the original
>>> email from the commenter on the public list:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/170
>>> 
>>> Actually I would recommend that only the editors would raise (in the sense
>>> of 'creating the issue in the issue tracker') issues about the vocabulary
>>> products, even if these issues are originally raised by someone else.
>>> 
>>> Also, an issue should be raised only during a call.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>>> 
>>>> On 6/12/14 7:07 PM, Hadley Beeman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks all, for a great discussion!
>>>> 
>>>> Eric Stephan has agreed to chair the next one on the 26th.
>>>> 
>>>> Minutes are here: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-06-12
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>>     Hadley
>> 
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 12:11:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:14 UTC