W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Products in Issue tracker

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:48:14 +0200
Message-ID: <538E429E.7040105@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Phil, all,

For the vocabs it would make sense to associate the vocab list. I believe the issue will be lower-level discussions most of the time, perhaps often editorial, so not a bad fit for what I understood you wanted to have the list for.
  
I have to say I'm a bit reluctant for creating issues for every item in a mail sent after a review, especially the editorial ones that require little discussion. This will be really a lot. We could have one issue per review mail, and then one derived issue when the mail really raises an issue that deserves individual discussion.

Cheers,

Antoine

On 6/3/14 8:16 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
> I have created the UCR doc as a product in the tracker but have not done so for the vocabs as I'm unsure whether to associate them with the vocabs list or the main one (it has to be one or the other).
>
> As for the BP doc, the group can do what it wants - which may be one product called Best Practices doc or one product for each of the separate areas.
>
> For those not familiar with issue tracking, it's a really useful way to make sure that e-mails about a topic are tracked as well as the eventual resolution. It helps manage the issues if they are tied to a specific deliverable (aka product) so that if a WG call is discussing, say, the Q&G vocabulary then we can just look at issues related to that and not all the others.
>
> HTH
>
> Phil.
>
> On 03/06/2014 19:02, Lee, Deirdre wrote:
>> Yes, this would be very handy. We will use the issue-tracker for recording and crossing-off all of the UC&R issues we address, so it would be great to be product specific.
>>
>> Apologies in advance if issue-tracker causes lots of emails in the next few days, but it will be good to have everything recorded.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Deirdre
>>
>> Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
>> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
>> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
>> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Bart van Leeuwen [bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl]
>> Sent: 30 May 2014 15:22
>> To: Public DWBP WG
>> Subject: Products in Issue tracker
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that we are moving towards publishing of at least the UC&R it would be nice to have products in the issue tracker.
>> Although I guess I can do that myself I'm not sure if we should obey standards in that regard any guidance would be welcome.
>>
>> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
>> Bart van Leeuwen
>>
>> ##############################################################
>> # twitter: @semanticfire
>> # netage.nl
>> # http://netage.nl<http://netage.nl/>
>> # Enschedepad 76
>> # 1324 GJ Almere
>> # The Netherlands
>> # tel. +31(0)36-5347479
>> ##############################################################
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 21:48:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:14 UTC