Re: followup to question about vocabularies and the glossary

Hi Christophe,

If you can do it, it will be great!

Thank you!
Bernadette

2014-12-12 10:09 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>:
>
> Hoi Bernadette,
>
> Sounds perfect! :)
> Will you do it or shall I take care ?
>
> Christophe
>
>
> On 12 December 2014 at 13:46, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> I propose to include the template of the BP at the beginning of Section
>> 6. "The Best Practices"  together with a general explanation about the
>> organization of this section, i.e., the organization of BP according to the
>> lifecycle. What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Bernadette
>>
>> 2014-12-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>
>> :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> About the need for something else I was just thinking that it could be
>>> good to keep the BP template we currently have at the end of the document
>>> and use it as a reading guideline for the reader.
>>> We could move it to the definitions, or close to the introduction, and
>>> update a bit the text in it so that the reader sees what each part of the
>>> BP answers.
>>>
>>> +1 ?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Christophe
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Researcher
>>> +31(0)6 14576494
>>> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>>> Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW) - http://dans.knaw.nl/
>>> e-Humanities Group (KNAW) - http://www.ehumanities.nl/
>>> Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web! -
>>> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Dec, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Annette Greiner
>>> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>>> 510-495-2935
>>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In my opinion, I think we just need some definitions to help the
>>> understanding of the document, like definitions for dataset, resource,
>>> vocabulary, ontology...or do we need something else ?
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Bernadette
>>>
>>> 2014-12-05 13:47 GMT-03:00 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <
>>> Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>:
>>>
>>>> Glossary is document dependent. Vocabularies OTOH should not be so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Lewis John McGibbney PhD, B.Sc., MAGU
>>>> Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
>>>> Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
>>>> Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>>>> California Institute of Technology
>>>> 4800 Oak Grove Drive
>>>> Pasadena, California 91109-8099
>>>> Mail Stop : 158-256C
>>>> Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
>>>> Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
>>>> Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
>>>> Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Dare Mighty Things
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/5/14, 7:22 AM, "Annette Greiner" <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Hi folks,
>>>> >During this morning¹s call, I asked whether developing a separate
>>>> >glossary might be redundant with the task we already have to develop a
>>>> >vocabulary. I was thinking that, since a vocabulary is a list of what
>>>> is
>>>> >meant by specific terms to be used in a certain context, if we were
>>>> >writing a vocabulary that would define what we were also contemplating
>>>> >putting into a glossary, the two would be redundant. Looking again at
>>>> the
>>>> >charter, I see that there are two vocabularies that we are expected to
>>>> >develop, and they are both pretty specific. Since neither of them is a
>>>> >general vocabulary for describing published datasets, I would suggest
>>>> >that we stick with adding a glossary, unless people think that there is
>>>> >something to be gained by making it a vocabulary. For my own purposes,
>>>> I
>>>> >think a glossary is fine.
>>>> >-Annette
>>>> >--
>>>> >Annette Greiner
>>>> >NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>>>> >Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>>>> >510-495-2935
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>> Centro de Informática
>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> Onderzoeker
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>
> *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*
>
> DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
> www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
> NWO.
>
>
> Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:
>
> DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
> Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
> www.dans.knaw.nl
>
>
> *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>
> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
> [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------