W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > August 2014

RE: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 14:30:23 +0000
To: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39BFB60FA80@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Just because requirements are obvious, doesn't mean we shouldn't include them :)
Measuring what 'high-value' is may be subjective, but 'Datasets selected for publication should be in demand by potential users' is measurable. However not sure if not publishing data because there is no immediate/obvious demand is good best practice either...
Do these requirements make sense in the context of quality vocabulary?


-----Original Message-----
From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
Sent: 03 June 2014 23:19
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/25


Raised by: Antoine Isaac
On product: 

Could #20 (Radar Parlamentar) be grouped with #12 (Dados.gov.br)? It seems the former is actually a usage case of the latter.



Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 14:30:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:16 UTC