W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-comments@w3.org > January 2017

Re: User defined information on the web

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:03:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE35VmyrsP0dwH_M+gNJCJrfTEMk7Kyhpw2z4X4mTi9RY3yTsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wolfgang Orthuber <orthuber@kfo-zmk.uni-kiel.de>
Cc: public-dwbp-comments@w3.org
Wolfgang,

are you suggesting that 20 years of work on the RDF stack should be
replaced by something based on a 5-page PDF?

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Wolfgang Orthuber
<orthuber@kfo-zmk.uni-kiel.de> wrote:
> Martynas,
>
> You may look at the RDF example shown in figure 1 of
> http://oceanrep.geomar.de/34556 . The DV (e.g. figure 4) is (in text form
> and so not optimized for hardware but nevertheless) much shorter, user
> defined, uniformly identified, comparable, searchable according to user
> defined criteria. There are more advantages. Main disadvantage is probably
> that the standardized online definitions are essential for understanding
> DVs. But also today we need somewhere an exact definition. It is
> advantageous if it can be at once located at the URL.
>
> Probably stepwise conversion of RDF expressions into DVs is recommendable.
> There is much freedom for DS definitions. Also namespaces, vocabularies can
> be defined as DSs.
>
> http://numericsearch.com shows that standardized definition of DSs (and DVs)
> is possible, but up to now there is no exact standard for this. I assumed
> that W3C could be interested in this, after rethinking this in detail.
>
> If there is interest we could deepen this together step by step.
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> On 13.01.2017 16:09, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>
>> TL;DR
>>
>> What's your point, exactly? What specifically are you
>> criticising/proposing? Name document sections, specifications etc.
>>
>>
>> Martynas
>>
>
Received on Friday, 13 January 2017 19:04:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 13 January 2017 19:04:05 UTC