Re: bugs in 5.10 Express the quality of a linkset

Hi Antoine,


On 25 July 2016 at 15:24, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> Dear Riccardo, Vladimir,
>
> I'm looking again at the DQV after the updates on the linkset section,
> triggered by Vladimir's comment.
> And I'm quite puzzled. To me there was a key difference between say,
> measurement_exactMatchAltLabelItDataset1 and
> measurement_exactMatchAltLabelItDataset2.
> What I understood is that same linkset can indeed lead to quite different
> 'completion gain' depending on which dataset the gain is evaluated on.
>
> To take a concrete example that will be familiar to Vladimir: say a linkset
> aligns one local, monolingual vocabulary with Getty's Art and Architecture
> Thesaurus, which has several languages and can have several labels for one
> concept in one language.
> If we try to pull the labels of one vocabulary into the other vocabulary,
> then it's likely that such 'pulling' will complement more the local
> vocabulary than Getty, as Getty was originally richer.
>
> Trying to say that the measurement are done at different dates don't really
> represent the fundamental distinction.

In the example, we have that some of the measurements done at
different date return different values...
Which implies some changes have occurred.

> Now, maybe the measurement should indicate clearly, which is the dataset is
> the 'completed one' on which the gain is measured, and which the 'completing
> one'.

You are right, I just realized  that we were reading  the example
differently. I was giving  for granted that dataset1 and dataset2
were respectivelly the subject and the object of the linkset, and that
is not necessarily the case.
In our importing  the complemented dataset is the
"void:subjectsTarget", whereas the completing one is the
"void:objectsTarget". So probably, we'd better to specify which
dataset is the subject and which is the object of the dataset.

That can be easily done, by replacing

:myLinkset
    a dcat:Dataset, void:Linkset ;
    dcterms:title "A Linkset between My dataset 1 and My dataset 2";
    void:linkPredicate skos:exactMatch ;
    void:target :myDataset1 ;
    void:target :myDataset2
    .

With

:myLinkset
    a dcat:Dataset, void:Linkset ;
    dcterms:title "A Linkset from My dataset 1 to My dataset 2";
    void:linkPredicate skos:exactMatch ;
    void:subjectsTarget :myDataset1 ;
    void:objectsTarget :myDataset2
.
If this is ok for you, I can change it.



if you want to see the impact of myDataset1 on myDataset2, you should
assess the importing of the linkset myLinkset's reciprocal,
:MyLinkset2 which is the linkset we can obtain inverting myLinkset,
defined as

: MyLinkset2
    a dcat:Dataset, void:Linkset ;
    dcterms:title "A Linkset from My dataset 2 to My dataset 1";
    void:linkPredicate skos:exactMatch ;
    void:subjectsTarget :myDataset2 ;
    void:objectsTarget :myDataset1
 .

A side comment: In the LOD,  MyLinkset2 and myLinkset are  very often
managed by distinct publishers and in the reality these linkesets
might   not to be reciprocal. That is why, I think it is better to
treat linkset as "oriented" and  the two linksets as distinct. That is
also coherent with the  definition of linkset provided by VoID.

>
> In any case, I'm tempted to put back the 'dataset1' and 'dataset2' into the
> identifiers of the measurement.
>
> What do you think?

After my comments, are you still tempted to put back the dataset1 and
dataset2? If yes, I would rather suggest to introduce MyLinkset2 in
the example, just to make clearer that the linksets are oriented.
Thought, i am not sure that level of complexity is worth ..

Best,
Riccardo



>
> Best,
>
> Antoine
>
>
> On 14/07/16 21:28, Riccardo Albertoni wrote:
>>
>> Dear Vladimir,
>> Thanks for your feedbacks.
>>
>> On 6 July 2016 at 17:40, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bugs in example https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/#ExpressQualLinkset
>>> 5.10 Express the quality of a linkset:
>>>
>>> - uses property dqv:hasObservation, apparently inverse of
>>> dqv:isMeasurementOf.
>>>    However, no such property is defined in dqv.ttl.
>>
>>
>> if you take a look at the in progress version
>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html, you can notice that there is
>> no
>> dqv:hasObservation  included in the document anymore. We corrected
>> this some time ago ;)
>>
>>>
>>> - there is no difference whatsoever between
>>> measurement_exactMatchAltLabelItDataset1 and
>>> measurement_exactMatchAltLabelItDataset2,
>>>    respectively measurement_exactMatchAltLabelEnDataset1 and
>>> measurement_exactMatchAltLabelEnDataset2
>>>    and measurement_exactMatchPrefLabelItDataset1 and
>>> measurement_exactMatchprefLabelItDataset2.
>>>    They both refer to :myLinkset, not to the one or another linked
>>> datasets.
>>
>>
>> The couples you have mentioned  are meant to  be repeated measurements
>> of quality of the same linkset.  Actually in the "in progress"
>> version, we have added  dcterms:date which makes that  a little more
>> clearer. I have also added a sentence to point this out.
>> I acknowledge that the name   measurement_exactMatchAltLabelItDataset
>> is quite confusing, as the measurements are  about linksets and not on
>> the datasets, so I have  cancelled  the "dataset" part.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - (minor) measurement_exactMatchprefLabelItDataset2   should use
>>> capitalized
>>> "Pref"
>>
>> Done! Thanks.
>>
>>>
>>> - defines this twice:
>>>      qb:component [ qb:measure dqv:value;];
>>>
>> I think it isn't doubled in the "in progress" version.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Riccardo
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
>>> clean.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:27:36 UTC