- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:50:19 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>, 'Vladimir Alexiev' <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- CC: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Vladimir, An additional point about these suggestions. I have re-worded and folded them in https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/46413acce0f6a42f9ae1f0f6b5ead4051eff3711 Our definition was in fact incorrectly marked as 'definition'. DQV shouldn't change the definition of properties defined elsewhere (here, Data Cube). In other words, all QB bases are not belong to us, yet ;-) So I've put it as 'usage note' instead. Cheers, Antoine On 25/07/16 15:33, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: > Dear Vladimir, > I have accepted this change as well. > Cheers, > Riccardo > > On 7 July 2016 at 12:55, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote: >> https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/422/commits/d61a11afb460563ca9222f62a94e5b1 >> 88a75eec9 >> >> Sec 4.1.2 Property: qb:dataset says >> "Indicates the dataset to a quality measurement belongs", >> which is on par with >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us :-) >> >> I suggest to reword this, and to add a clarification >> "This is different from the dataset whose quality is being measured, which >> is linked by dqv:computedOn" >> >> - <td>Indicates the dataset to a quality >> measurement (which is an >> - RDF Data Cube observation) >> belongs.</td> >> + <td>Indicates the dataset that a >> quality measurement (which is an >> + RDF Data Cube observation) belongs >> to. >> + This is different from the dataset >> whose quality is being measured, which is linked by dqv:computedOn </td> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean. >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 25 July 2016 17:50:58 UTC