- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:21:36 +0200
- To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Cc: public-dwbp-comments <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Dear Vladimir, Thanks for your feedbacks. A part of DQV is derived by DAQ, so we use expectedDataType, as we want to try to be consistent with DAQ. I wonder if daq:expectedDataType and schema:rangeIncludes can be somehow related each other. In that case, we could try to refer to both when defining our dqv:expectedDataType. Any suggestion ? Cheers, Riccardo On 6 July 2016 at 16:52, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote: > Instead of making a new property, > maybe it's better to use schema:rangeIncludes? > That's a lot more prevalent than daq:expectedDataType > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean. > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riccardo Albertoni Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/ http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 16:22:08 UTC