W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-comments@w3.org > April 2016

Re: License comments

From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:34:31 +1000
Cc: public-dwbp-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <6394FD5D-7C89-4028-A277-6C23439BD0D8@iannel.la>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>

> On 30 Mar 2016, at 02:52, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
> 
> The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language has a property called cc:license. We refer to this property in our doc. Is it ok for you?

Yes.

> The reference for CC points to CCRel, when in fact, it should refer to the CC license URL set:
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/>
> 
> In this case, I think it is correct because we are talking about machine-readable version of the license metadata. We can also include a lnk to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/> when we mention the human-readable version of the license metadata.

The point of difference is that CC has both machine-identifiable licenses (using the well-known fixed URIs), and machine-readable licenses (with ccREL).  They are two different approaches.

So in example 5 -  “machine-readable” -  I would expect to have seen a ccREL expression.

Renato
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 12:34:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 10 April 2016 12:35:00 UTC