RE: doc- prefix in DPUB-ARIA

thank you


Rich Schwerdtfeger



From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: "Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "W3C
            PF - DPUB Joint Task Force" <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>
Date: 10/01/2015 04:33 PM
Subject: RE: doc- prefix in DPUB-ARIA



I’m not involved in branding, so I will need to ask some people.

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 12:36 PM
To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
Cc: Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) <janina@rednote.net>; W3C PF - DPUB
Joint Task Force <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>
Subject: Re: doc- prefix in DPUB-ARIA



Hi Cynthia,

The digital publishers would like to change the prefix to doc- vs. dpub-,
for the dpub-aria module, as they believe ultimately these would be used on
the web (e.g. doc-glossary) too and not just digital books. We are pushing
for your feedback as .doc and .docx files are pretty much defacto today and
even though this is not about a file extension format we wanted to make
sure you were ok with this before adopting it.

Are you ok with this?

Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 21:52:30 UTC