Re: draft text for charter

Deborah,

thanks for taking the first shoot at this!

not reacting to the content just the form: please consider to be as terse as possible. The charter should not be too long and should be balanced among the various requirements. At first glance what you write may simply be too long.

In particular, the charter should not include operative issues like the creation of sub-groups. This is an organizational matter, and it is up to tge WG how, operationally, it should achieve its chartered goals...

Thanks

Ivan

---
Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net

(Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)



> On 9 Feb 2017, at 18:29, deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote:
> 
> all right, have at it, folks. Edit away.
> 
> 
> 
> The Digital Publishing Working Group will include an Accessibility subgroup [task force?] responsible for guaranteeing that accessibility considerations are incorporated into all of the Working Group's deliverables. All recommendation-track deliverables will contain normative accessibility requirements. General W3C accessibility requirements such as WCAG will be integrated as a matter of course; any extended requirements will delineated as conformance requirements in the Digital Publishing Working Group's normative specifications.
> 
> The Digital Publishing Working Group will have prearranged pipelines with all appropriate W3C groups (delineated below in the "Coordination" section) in order to create a pipeline from the accessibility requirements created as part of our recommendation-track deliverables into the appropriate recommendations for more generalized technology, whether into the generalized recommendation, or into a subset recommendation such as a WAI-ARIA module.
> 
> -Deborah
> 
> 

Received on Sunday, 12 February 2017 15:50:39 UTC