Re: McCathieNevile-6 - change of disposition to accepted

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:45:39 +0530, Rhys Lewis <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com> wrote:

> Hello Chaals,
> 
> DIWG still has an outstanding item against its DISelect specifications 
relating to our failure to provide a link to the table of contents in the HTML 
versions of our documents [1]. Our reasons for not wanting to accept the 
original comment were based on a desire to use the 'standard' mechanisms for 
converting xmlspec documents to XHTML.
> 
> On reflection, and because we have found it necessary to change the process 
for other reasons, we have decided to accept the comment and to create the 
necessary HTML link element in the head of the generated documents that allows 
browsers, like Opera, to render a short cut to the TOC.
> 
> For the record, we made the necessary change in the XSLT that we use to 
convert between xmlspec and XHTML.
> 
> Perhaps you could indicate your acceptance of the new disposition by posting 
to this list? Editor's drafts of the documents with the additional link can be 
viewed via the DIWG internal page [2].
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006JulSep/0008.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/di/Group/di-selection/

Thanks. I'm a happy camper :)

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com