Re: LC-1566 XHTML 2 Dependency in DISelect

It seems appropriate

Thank you

Regards

Mohamed

On 1/29/07, Rhys Lewis <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Mohamed,
>
> Thanks you for your comments on the DISelect last call [1]. In your mail you
> raise a number of points.
>
> This particular response deals with the apparent dependency of DISelect on
> XHTML 2. DIWG has identified this comment as
>
> LC-1566 XHTML 2 Dependency.
>
> DIWG accepts this comment as indicating an editorial error in the DISelect
> documents.
>
> The DIWG would like to thank you for spotting this unintended dependency.
> The text in the introduction is inappropriate for the current form of the
> specification. Discussion of the rationale for a language profile is no
> longer appropriate for the DISelect. It belongs in the DIAL specification
> [2]. It is not the intent of the DIWG to restrict the use of DISelect to any
> particular host language. Indeed, languages other than XHTML have expressed
> interest in using it.
>
> The material relating to the device independent profile while not actually
> incorrect, is potentially confusing and unnecessary and has been removed.
> The introduction no longer contains a section entitled "Towards a Device
> Independent Markup Language Profile". The first two paragraphs of that
> section have been removed completly in both the DISelect and the XAF
> documents.
>
> I hope that you will agree that this is an appropriate change, and will
> indicate your acceptance by a response to this mail on this list.
>
> Very best wishes and thanks again for spotting this error.
>
> Rhys Lewis
>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2007JanMar/0000.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/dial/
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 20:50:44 UTC