W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-diselect-editors@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Gilman-16

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:36:13 -0500
Message-Id: <p06110427c1770f30f8d4@[69.143.137.56]>
To: public-diselect-editors@w3.org

Works for me.

Disposition accepted.

At 4:38 PM +0000 12/9/05, Roland Merrick wrote:
>Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last 
>call [1]. As part of this you include 
>"<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#error-events>Exception 
>handling" which we have split into two parts. This response deals 
>with the part that begins: "The wording in this section is IMHO 
>non-standard and should be regularized. " The second part was 
>addressed in the attached note.
>
>The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-16.
>
>This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.
>
>DIWG Response
>=============
>
>We have not accepted this part of the comments, the exception 
>handling model and terminology is meant to be completely consistent 
>with that of XForms. For reasons of consistency, DIWG has chosen to 
>retain that terminology. However there are typographic errors in 
>this section which we will address in Gilman-17.
>
>[1] 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html
>
>Regards, Roland
>----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 09/12/2005 16:32 -----
>Roland Merrick/UK/IBM
>
>17/11/2005 15:49
>To
>public-diselect-editors@w3.org
>cc
>w3c-di-wg@w3.org
>Subject
>Gilman-17
>
>
>
>
>Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last 
>call [1]. As part of this you include 
>"<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#error-events>Exception 
>handling" which we have split into two parts. This response deals 
>with the part that states: "The nouns in the <dl> explanation of the 
>categories *must* be aligned with the suffixes used in the event 
>names.  Also the prose in the paragraphs.  In the current prose 
>there are two concepts used (failure and error in the above lexicon) 
>and three ways that each is alluded to.  Fix it."
>
>The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-17.
>
>This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.
>
>DIWG Response
>=============
>
>We agree and have corrected the typographical errors. We now use the 
>terms error and exception consistently throughout the document. 
>Other changes in this area of the document are anticipated in order 
>to address Gilman-10 and McCathieNevile-5.
>
>[1] 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html
>
>Regards, Roland
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 04:36:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:10 GMT