W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-diselect-editors@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Fw: Gilman-12

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:16:41 -0500
Message-Id: <p06110411c176fc037a62@[69.143.137.56]>
To: public-diselect-editors@w3.org

At 5:07 PM +0000 11/17/05, Roland Merrick wrote:
>We agree with this comment. We have updated the description 
>associated with AVTs. There is also an example of their use.

... and I have looked at the new language in

http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-20061010/#sec-avt

Looks good to me.

[for the record: Yes, I accept the disposition of this comment.]

Al
>Greetings Al, my apologies, should have sent this to you and not 
>just to diselect-editors list.
>
>Regards, Roland
>Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1926-465440
>Mobile: +44 (0)77 2520-0620
>----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 17/11/2005 17:04 -----
>Roland Merrick/UK/IBM
>
>17/11/2005 15:03
>To
>public-diselect-editors@w3.org
>cc
>w3c-di-wg@w3.org
>Subject
>Gilman-12
>
>
>
>
>Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last 
>call [1]. As part of this you include "Importing 
><http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#avt>Attribute 
>Value Templates" which states:: "The intent to import a capability 
>from XPath is clear but it would seem that the language used to say 
>this is imprecise.  Isn't there a more precise way to say just what 
>is being imported, here?"
>
>The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-12.
>
>This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.
>
>DIWG Response
>=============
>
>We agree with this comment. We have updated the description 
>associated with AVTs. There is also an example of their use.
>
>[1] 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html
>
>Regards, Roland
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 04:33:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:10 GMT