W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-diselect-editors@w3.org > October to December 2005

Gilman-16

From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:38:26 +0000
To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, public-diselect-editors@w3.org
Cc: w3c-di-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF2FC6DB12.3BFF8BEC-ON802570D2.005AE677-802570D2.005B6812@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last call 
[1]. As part of this you include "Exception handling" which we have split 
into two parts. This response deals with the part that begins: "The 
wording in this section is IMHO non-standard and should be regularized. " 
The second part was addressed in the attached note.

The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-16.

This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.

DIWG Response
=============

We have not accepted this part of the comments, the exception handling 
model and terminology is meant to be completely consistent with that of 
XForms. For reasons of consistency, DIWG has chosen to retain that 
terminology. However there are typographic errors in this section which we 
will address in Gilman-17. 

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html 


Regards, Roland
----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 09/12/2005 16:32 -----

Roland Merrick/UK/IBM 
17/11/2005 15:49

To
public-diselect-editors@w3.org
cc
w3c-di-wg@w3.org
Subject
Gilman-17





Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last call 
[1]. As part of this you include "Exception handling" which we have split 
into two parts. This response deals with the part that states: "The nouns 
in the <dl> explanation of the categories *must* be aligned with the 
suffixes used in the event names.  Also the prose in the paragraphs.  In 
the current prose there are two concepts used (failure and error in the 
above lexicon) and three ways that each is alluded to.  Fix it." 

The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-17.

This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.

DIWG Response
=============

We agree and have corrected the typographical errors. We now use the terms 
error and exception consistently throughout the document. Other changes in 
this area of the document are anticipated in order to address Gilman-10 
and McCathieNevile-5.

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html 


Regards, Roland
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 16:39:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:10 GMT