McCathieNevile-5

Greetings Charles, thanks for your comments on the content selection last 
call [1]. As part of this your fifth point states: 

<snip>5. Section 5.8 allows the author to control re-rendering, by 
suppressing the ability to recalculate what content should be included. 
This seems like a bad idea, since while it can be used to allow an author 
to force a user into a particular font size, window configuration, etc, I 
don't see any positive effects for it.
</snip> 

The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier McCathieNevile-5.

This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.

DIWG Response
=============
We have declined this comment  . . . 
As the WG discussed this and a related one Gilman-10, we realised that 
there are a number of deficiencies in the reprocess feature. We have 
decided to remove the process element and the associated 
diselect-reprocess event.


[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0010.html

Regards, Roland