W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org > May to June 2007

Re: Raising some points of concern

From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:18:31 +0700
Message-ID: <c09b00eb0706232018k39ad80e3j99bacc828222b6d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Don Cameron" <rural.life@gmail.com>
Cc: "Gavin Treadgold" <gt@kestrel.co.nz>, "W3C Disaster Management Ontology List" <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
Hi Don

 Surely
> you should be asking the UN, the International Red Cross, the Salvation
> Army, National Disaster Response Agencies... Not this group!



This group is evaluating adoption for W3 recommendation, and participants
have different experiences and backgrounds, all important to the development
of an ontology

I recommend following standard research methodology to resolve this issue

According to my informal survey, as already mentioned in previous post, it
emerges that
EM is a preferred choice of many influential organisations, as well as the
preference of many individuals involvvd in similar efforts that I have
spoken to

In order to minimise wasteful discussion, I have started a formal evaluation
on the wiki
Look forward to your contribution there

PDM

Don
>
>
>


-- 



Paola Di Maio *****
School of Information Technology
Mae Fah Luang University
Chiang Rai - Thailand
*********************************************
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 03:18:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:09 GMT