paola.dimaio@gmail.com writes: > great stuff, at least we know it was just a queue issue If this was William's first post to a W3C mailing list it would have gone into our Archive Approval (AA) system which would have replied to him asking his permission to archive. There is an additional delay where first time posters are given additional scrutiny to try to ween out spammers before putting them in our global accept list. It also could have been slowed down by a busy queue. > On 6/20/07, Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz> wrote: >> >> >> Yep - I replied to William's direct reply to me. I have noticed that >> there has been some leapfrogging of replies. >> >> Direct message received 19 JUN 2110 UTC >> List message received 20 JUN 0539 UTC -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:21:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:09 GMT