- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:24:25 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@vivliostyle.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, public-new-work@w3.org
Le 25/04/2017 à 12:43, Ivan Herman a écrit : > Daniel, > > I have just made an update to the proposed charter text (still in the separate branch[1]): > > - separated the rec-track and non-rec-track documents in the list of input documents > - I have also added a reference to HTML, CSS, and SVG in the list of input documents with some general text on why those documents appear there > > Are these o.k. with you? Sorry for the delay, I had too much on my radar yesterday to review your changes. Your changes are fine by me with one exception, that I spent a lot time thinking about: I still think the two last sentences of the last paragraph of the Scope section, starting with "EPUB 4 must not..." should be dropped or modified enough to be a recommended option and not an enforcement any more. This is something to be decided by the WG and such a technical choice should not be enforced by the Charter. To be more precise, I can't accept the too strong "must not" and "must be a type". With a compromise there, I would withdraw my formal objection. Hth. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 08:25:05 UTC