Re: Re 2: Proposal for charter changes, in view of the formal objections by Vivliostyle & Disruptive Innovation from Daniel Glazman on 2017-04-25 (public-digipub-ig@w3.org from April 2017)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:10:58 +0200
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@vivliostyle.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, public-new-work@w3.org
Message-ID: <175fe959-66e6-4fc9-cb0a-ec62c61bb2ba@disruptive-innovations.com>

Le 24/04/2017 à 21:04, Ivan Herman a écrit :
> Daniel,
> 
> I have just realized that I may have misunderstood what you said about rec track input documents. Do you mean to separate those documents that are either recs or are on rec-track by another WG from those that are either notes or drafts for notes? If that is what you mean, then I agree that would be helpful and I am happy doing it (tomorrow...)

Yes, that was exactly my suggestion.

</Daniel>

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 09:11:35 UTC