W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Status of https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-latinreq/

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:17:51 +0900
Cc: r12a <ishida@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9034FE72-BDD3-4B8A-866F-E6A1818B26CB@rivoal.net>
To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Hi Tzviya and Richard,

I believe this document is useful to the CSSWG, and would encourage it to be maintained (and reviewed by the i18n WG). I don't know about others, but I have myself consulted it multiple times when considering possible improvements to CSS.

Dave Cramer is active in the CSSWG, and to the extend that things in the document are things he knows, him bringing these facts up when relevant to the discussion may be a halfway decent substitute to the document, but for those of us that do not have full time access to Dave's brain, I think it's worth having :)

 - Florian


> On Sep 16, 2016, at 02:35, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Sorry for the extremely delayed response. This has been an ongoing conversation. We, as a group, consider the document valuable, but we are trying to determine if others find it useful. If not, we may not wish to spend the time maintaining it. We will have more information for you after TPAC.
> 
> BTW, when you planning the presentation on Indic layout? I'm sure several DPUB members would be interested in attending.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tzviya
> 
> Tzviya Siegman
> Information Standards Lead
> Wiley
> 201-748-6884
> tsiegman@wiley.com 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r12a [mailto:ishida@w3.org] 
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 7:11 AM
> To: W3C Digital Publishing IG
> Subject: Status of https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-latinreq/
> 
> dear Digipub IG folks,
> 
> i was actioned by the i18n WG to ask you what is the status of the document
> 
> Requirements for Latin Text Layout and Pagination https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-latinreq/
> 
> and whether you think it would be usefulf for the i18n WG to review it.
> 
> thanks,
> ri
> 
Received on Friday, 16 September 2016 03:18:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:45 UTC