W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr] Remove "Other" and "misc" (#68)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:26 +0200
Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <55C629C6-D49C-43AF-B90B-EF5940B884CE@w3.org>
To: Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>
+1 for the removal for both sections.

The "domain semantics" seems to reflect what the group has been doing in conjunction with ARIA. Whilst important, I am not sure this is a specifically PWP use case and issue; it is a work that we (the dpub community) would have to pursue no matter what… Ie, removing it from this document sounds right to me.


> On 1 Sep 2016, at 00:21, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please take a look at this pull request and confirm that you are OK with this proposal of removing what had been the “Other” and “Misc Requirements” sections of PWP-UCR.
> The one use case that I pause over is what had been labeled 9.3:
> “9.3 Specialized Domain Semantics
> Placeholder: Formal usage terms and engineering or legal documents, possibly for accessibility also.
> Specialized semantics are required for users and processors.”
> While I agree that we have a need for specialized semantics,  I am not sure that this document is the right place to identify the need.
> Some potential use cases could include:
> TextBookPublisher organizes some of its publications around learning objectives (as opposed to chapters). Every paragraph, question, and assessment in the publication is associated with a learning objective. For processing purposes, the publisher requires a method of identifying the objects that are learning objectives. Users require a method of accessing the learning objectives from other parts of the publication.
> Georgina is publishing a paper with groundbreaking mathematical information. She indicates which part of the paper is the proof using specialized, discoverable vocabularies so that she can share her work with others.
> There are numerous other use cases. I hesitate to add a section to the document for this alone. Does it belong here at all? Where can we add it?
> Reminder: As of 1 September, we enter a feature freeze so that Nick and Heather can edit.
> Thanks,
> Tzviya
> Tzviya Siegman
> Information Standards Lead
> Wiley
> 201-748-6884
> tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>
> From: Tzviya [mailto:notifications@github.com <mailto:notifications@github.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:08 PM
> To: w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr
> Subject: [w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr] Remove "Other" and "misc" (#68)
> Use cases in "Other" and "Misc" duplicate use cases present in other sections.
> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
>   https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68 <https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68>
> Commit Summary
> Remove "Other" and "misc"
> File Changes
> M index.html <https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68/files#diff-0> (94)
> Patch Links:
> https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68.patch <https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68.patch>
> https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68.diff <https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68.diff>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/68>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALFPWcJUJyAAk0eMTUvsUmafl44vKFFwks5qlftQgaJpZM4JyHfI>.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Thursday, 1 September 2016 05:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:45 UTC