W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > October 2016

RE: The MQ (or not) issue; what we are seeking

From: Paul Topping <pault@dessci.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 05:07:36 +0000
To: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, "'Liam R. E. Quin'" <liam@w3.org>, 'Bill Kasdorf' <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, 'Alan Stearns' <stearns@adobe.com>, "'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6C5B1ABA88AF446821B281774E6DB71B77C728C@FERMAT.corp.dessci>
When it is suggested that there are ebook readers that don't support JavaScript, what is meant is that they don't support JS embedded in the ebook content itself. Am I correct? AFAIK, virtually all ebook readers are browser engine-based and use JS code in their implementation. They just don't want content to contain JS as it is a potential security risk. I only point this out in case it makes a difference in this MQ discussion.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Kerscher [mailto:kerscher@montana.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 6:44 PM
> To: 'Liam R. E. Quin' <liam@w3.org>; 'Bill Kasdorf'
> <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>; 'Alan Stearns' <stearns@adobe.com>;
> 'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken' <tsiegman@wiley.com>; Peter Krautzberger
> <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>; public-digipub-ig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: The MQ (or not) issue; what we are seeking
> You ask: "Does this have to work in ebook readers (which might or might not
> support JavaScript) as well as in Web browsers?"
> George responds: Yes, the publishers want to distribute their content into all
> markets. The visual presentation is essential, and people using access
> technology need to get at the semantically rich information.
> Best
> George
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam R. E. Quin [mailto:liam@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 5:52 PM
> To: Bill Kasdorf; Alan Stearns; Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken; Peter Krautzberger;
> public-digipub-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: The MQ (or not) issue; what we are seeking
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 15:17 +0000, Bill Kasdorf wrote:
> > What we need is an interim solution that will make it safe for
> > publishers to deliver the MathML along with the image that they want
> > displayed visually. For now.
> support JavaScript) as well as in Web browsers?
> Liam
> >

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 05:08:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:46 UTC