Re: [dpub-loc] 20160217 minutes

Hi Leonard, that's quite a bold statement, but I suspect the minutes could
do with a few corrections. At any rate, I look forward to the recap from
you and Ivan at the next opportunity. PS: it was a small quorum on this
concall, but I was under the impression that the participants agreed on the
broad lines of your proposal, with only details to clarify. Regards, Daniel
On 17 Feb 2016 9:17 p.m., "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:

> Sorry that I was unable to attend today, especially since the discussion
> (based on the minutes) seems to completely undo all the work that Ivan,
> myself and others did on the mailing list during the past week.   The
> position presented by Daniel is the exact opposite of what Ivan’s musings
> (adjusted based on mail conversations) presented.
>
> I think we need to go do this over again next week – which si
> extremely unfortunate.
>
> Leonard
>
> Fro  "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
> Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 11:46 AM
> To: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <
> public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: [dpub-loc] 20160217 minutes
> Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM
>
> Minutes from today’s meeting:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/02/17-dpub-loc-minutes.html
>
>
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
>
> Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead
>
> Wiley
>
> 201-748-6884
>
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
>
>